Association Between Altmetrics and Traditional Bibliometrics in the Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association and The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery.

BACKGROUND: As the dissemination of scientific knowledge pervades social media, appraising impact with traditional bibliometrics led to the creation of alternative metrics, termed altmetrics. Lacking existent foot and ankle surgery literature altmetric analysis, we analyzed the 10 most-cited articles in the Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association (JAPMA) and The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery (JFAS) in 2013 and 2017. METHODS: Citation count, Altmetric Attention Score (AAS), Mendeley Reads, and professional society-affiliated Twitter ages were collected and analyzed with descriptive statistics. Pearson correlation coefficient identified relationships between traditional and nontraditional metrics. RESULTS: The 40 articles showed a high median and large range in total citations for JAPMA (13.5 [range, 5-27]) and JFAS (28 [range, 5-69]). Media AAS Mendeley Reads also showed a high median with wide range for both JAPMA (32.5 [range, 0-135]) and JFAS (25 [range, 0-113)]. No significant correlation between total citations and AAS was seen in 2013 (r = -0.205; P = .388) or 2017 (r = -0.029; P = .903). The correlation between total citation count and Mendeley reads was significant in 2017 (r = 0.646; P = .002) but not in 2013 (r = -0.078; P = .744). Although cumulative AAS increased from 2013 to 2017 by 68.75%, with Twitter contributing most to both periods, there existed no significant correlation with Twitter age and the correlation coefficient between AAS and total citations (r = 0.655; P = .173). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this investigation show the utility and predictivity of alternative metrics in complementing traditional bibliometrics and encourage the promotion of publications through journal-specific social media.

Using Google Trends to Identify Seasonal Variation in Foot and Ankle Pathology.

BACKGROUND: Google Trends proves to be a novel tool to ascertain the level of public interest in pathology and treatments. From anticipating nascent epidemics with data-driven prevention campaigns to identifying interest in cosmetic or bariatric surgery, Google Trends provides physicians real-time insight into the latest consumer trends. METHODS: We used Google Trends to identify temporal trends and variation in the search volume index of four groups of keywords that assessed practitioner-nomenclature inquiries, in addition to podiatric-specific searches for pain, traumatic injury, and common podiatric pathology over a 10-year period. The Mann-Kendall trend test was used to determine a trend in the series, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to determine whether there was a significant difference between summer and winter season inquiries. Significance was set at P ≤ .05. RESULTS: The terms "podiatrist" and "foot doctor" experienced increasing Search Volume Index (SVI) and seasonal variation, whereas the terms "foot surgeon" and "podiatric surgeon" experienced no such increase. "Foot pain," "heel pain," "toe pain," and "ankle pain" experienced a significant increase in SVI, with "foot pain" maintaining the highest SVI at all times. Similar results were seen with the terms "foot fractures," "bunion," "ingrown toenail," and "heel spur." These terms all experienced statistically significant increasing trends; moreover, the SVI was significantly higher in the summer than in the winter for each of these terms. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show the utility in illustrating seasonal variation in Internet interest of pathologies today's podiatrist commonly encounters. By identifying the popularity and seasonal variation of practitioner- and pathology-specific search inquiries, resources can be allocated to effectively address current public inquiries. With this knowledge, providers can learn what podiatric-specific interests are trending in their local communities and market their practice accordingly throughout the year.

Anatomic Description of the Distal and Intercuneiform Articulations: A Cadaveric Study.

The medial, intermediate, and lateral cuneiforms play a pivotal role in foot biomechanics. When correcting deformities of this joint complex understanding the clinical anatomy remains imperative to provide both anatomic reduction and appropriately sized fixation. This study qualitatively and quantitatively describes the distal and intercuneiform articulations and their clinical implications. The cuneiform complex of 10 fresh-frozen cadavers was dissected, and the width of the complex was measured with digital calipers. Following further dissection, the distal articular surface shapes of each cuneiform were described, and the individual heights and widths were measured. The intercuneiform articular facets were described and the protrusion distances, between the medial and lateral cuneiforms with the intermediate cuneiform, were measured. The width of the joint complex was 44.74 ± 3.40 mm. The medial cuneiform height, width, dorsal anterior, and plantar protrusion distances were 32.58 ± 2.77 mm, 14.08 ± 2.26 mm, 8.51 ± 2.17 mm, and 6.66 ± 1.21 mm, respectively. The intermediate cuneiform height and width was 23.05 ± 1.92 mm and 9.59 ± 1.85 mm, respectively. The lateral cuneiform height, width, dorsal, and plantar anterior protrusion distances were 23.38 ± 2.67 mm, 10.98 ± 3.01 mm, and 6.76 ± 1.43 mm, and 4.19 ± 1.10 mm respectively. The anterior surface of the medial, intermediate, and lateral cuneiforms was described as reniform, triangular, and triangular, respectively. The majority of intermediate cuneiforms shared an inverted L-shaped articulation with the medial cuneiform, and a B-shaped articulation with the lateral cuneiform. The shapes and sizes of distal and intercuneiform articulations were described with shared anatomical features across cadavers. Understanding the dimensions of the respective surfaces allows for anatomically appropriate fixation size.